Monday, October 27, 2008

Tacoma: Wells Fargo Attacked In Solidarity With Detainees


During the morning of October the Twenty Fifth, a group of people smashed out five of the six windows of a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage office in Tacoma, WA. The office was located in Old Town Tacoma, one of the cities wealthiest areas.

This was done in solidarity with the 13 people recently detained by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement in Shelton, WA and the people recently detained in San Francisco, CA.

Wells Fargo is like every other bank. As we all can see from the collapsing economy, these bankers do not care how they make their money so long as they make it. They are blinded by their greed and will allow the most dreadful things to arise in their quest for profit.

Wells Fargo, in its own quest for profit, finances GEO Group, a company which runs prisons across the planet. One such prison is the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in the tideflats of Tacoma. While the bankers count their money, the jailers in the detention center treat the people inside like subhumans. These people in cages are only trying to work, to feed themselves and their families and to create a better life for themselves. For this they are jailed and portrayed as the enemy. Immigrants are not responsbile for the collapse of the economy. Bankers are.

It took years and years for the Nazis to create a fearful and hateful enough culture to allow things like the ghettos and the concentration camps to exist. We attack Wells Fargo because we see the same thing approaching. Everything in your head might be telling you the opposite, but if drive down to the detention center and stare at it, you will be looking at the blossoming seed of one thing:

FASCISM.

To those of you reading this, please do not overeact to the use of this word. We do not use it lightly. And when we say it, we mean it.

Get a group together and hold a theatre performance in a Wells Fargo. Stand in a line and block ICE busses from enterring the prisons. Spit on ICE agents. Hold a picket in front of a Wells Fargo. Break their windows. Destroy their ATMS. Hide people with no documents. Set up an alert system. Do whatever it takes to stop what is coming.

Our hearts are with every person locked up in every cage. This act was for them and their families. We all need to act right now. If it was your mother in a cage you would not be idly sitting by as the bars close around more and more people.

This text will be sent to the Tacoma News Tribune, the Weekly Volcano, Kiro 7 News, King 5 News, Fox 13 News, The Stranger, Seattle Weekly and each of the West Coast Indymedia sites.

Rebellion against Italian education reform grows


Protest against government cuts in school and university research funding has escalated with mass street demonstrations and occupations spreading across the country.

Massive protests are taking place in many Italian cities and towns against Berlusconi's government school reforms, which consist of cuts on public university and research funds, the introduction of student behavior evaluation and the separation of foreign students from the Italian ones in different classes.

For almost 1 month throughout Italy High Schools and Universities have been occupied by students and teachers, and lessons are taking place outdoors.

Massive street protests have disrupted the normal functioning of the cities.

The demonstrations are growing as they go along and this trend is expected to continue next month.

There was an assault on the Roma Film Festival as Al Pacino arrived, and on Sunday primary schools children joined the protest.

Many of the demonstrations have been of a highly creative and amusing variety. The mainstream media has remained quite quiet on the issue, but News has been spreading via social networking and user generated content websites such as youtube.

http://www.libcom.org/news/we-wont-pay-the-crisis-26102008

Chevron Faces Suit Over Nigerian Violence


Larry Bowoto's left arm is still scarred and numb where a soldier's bullet struck it in 1998 while he was aboard a Chevron oil platform in Nigeria. During the course of the incident, Bowoto was shot several more times, another man was wounded and yet another was killed.

[Larry Bowoto protests in front of Chevron headquarters in San Ramon after he attended a shareholders meeting in May. (Paul Sakuma / AP)]Larry Bowoto protests in front of Chevron headquarters in San Ramon after he attended a shareholders meeting in May. (Paul Sakuma / AP)
On Monday, in only the second trial of its kind, a federal jury will convene in San Francisco to decide whether Bowoto and his companions were violent hostage takers or innocent victims - and whether a U.S. corporation, whose foreign subsidiary summoned the security forces, is responsible for the bloodshed.

"I'm not a violent person," Bowoto, 44, said through an interpreter during a recent Bay Area visit. "We were peaceful protesters" who "never expected Chevron to be so brutal."
Chevron denies claim

The San Ramon oil company paints a different picture: Bowoto, the company says, led a group of armed men who seized the platform, demanding jobs and money, and held 200 employees captive during three days of fruitless negotiations before Chevron's Nigerian subsidiary - Chevron Nigeria Ltd. - called for military help.

"This is a case of right versus wrong, legal versus illegal, peaceful negotiation versus violent extortion," Chevron said in a statement.

In May, after Bowoto appeared at Chevron's shareholders' meeting and said the company "must give up violence as a way of doing business," CEO David O'Reilly called his remarks "outrageous" and said Bowoto was guilty of "a criminal act."

Nineteen plaintiffs, including Bowoto, accuse Chevron of colluding with a notoriously violent military force to quell the protest. The case represents a 21st century application of one of the nation's oldest laws, the Alien Tort Claims Act.

Passed by the first Congress in 1789, the law lets foreigners file damage claims in U.S. courts for international human rights violations anywhere in the world. Originally focused on sea piracy, the law took on new life with rulings in the 1980s that allowed survivors of foreign torture to sue military leaders who entered the United States.

A 2004 Supreme Court ruling limited the law's scope to the most serious abuses of internationally accepted legal standards but left the door open for suits against multinational companies that allegedly collaborate with repressive governments.

In the only such case to go to trial, a federal jury in Alabama last year absolved the Drummond coal company of responsibility for the killings of three union leaders by paramilitary forces in Colombia. Judges have dismissed several other suits, under the Supreme Court's stringent standard, and a few have been settled.
Unocal settled Burma suit

A suit against Unocal by Burmese villagers, who blamed the company for forced labor, rape and torture by soldiers at a natural gas pipeline, was scheduled for trial in Los Angeles in 2005, but the company settled it for an undisclosed amount of money. A suit similar to Bowoto's, filed against Royal Dutch Shell by Nigerians including relatives of Ken Saro-Wiwa, a writer and activist hanged by the military regime in 1995, is scheduled to go to trial in New York in February.

"Courts have been vigilant in allowing only the most well-founded cases to go forward," said attorney Marco Simons of the nonprofit advocacy group EarthRights International, a lawyer for the plaintiffs. A victory in this case, he said, would send a message to corporations operating abroad that "if they are complicit in human rights abuses, they can expect to be held accountable."

Chevron, while maintaining the villagers' claims are unfounded, also says that the 1789 law "provides a financial incentive to attack U.S.-based corporations with international operations" and that the plaintiffs "are using the U.S. courts to intervene in Nigerian affairs."

The events date from May 1998, when members of the Ilaje tribe in the Niger Delta went to Chevron Nigeria's Parabe platform, 9 miles off the Atlantic coast, to protest the company's employment practices, and what they described as the destruction of fresh water, farm lands and fishing by oil drilling and dredging.

"It now takes four or five hours to find any usable water," Bowoto said in his recent interview with The Chronicle, describing the conditions that he said still exist. "It takes days to find any significant fish. The same thing has happened to farming."
Threat of 'mass riot'

Chevron, in court papers and public statements, described the protesters as a group of "armed youths" carrying machetes, knives and clubs and demanding jobs and money. The company cited letters from "Concerned Ilaje Citizens," including Bowoto, to Chevron earlier that month warning that refusal to allocate jobs fairly "could lead to mass riot" and asking, "Which language do you understand? Is it violence or sea piracy, war or peace?"

But plaintiffs' lawyers have a faxed message sent by a company official to the U.S. Embassy on the third day of the protest, describing the villagers as unarmed and saying the situation "has remained calm since their arrival."

Soldiers arrived the next morning on helicopters leased from Chevron. One villager, Arolika Irowarinum, was shot to death. Two men were wounded - Bowoto, who was shot several times, and Bassey Jeje. A fourth man, Bola Oyimbo, allegedly was beaten and tortured, and later died of unrelated causes.

Chevron says its subsidiary was simply reporting a crime when it contacted security forces and had no reason to anticipate violence. The plaintiffs counter that the company was well aware of the soldiers' violent reputation and approved the plan that led to the attack.

Those are factual disputes that a jury must resolve, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said in a pretrial ruling. She said jurors also must decide whether Chevron's control over its subsidiary was so extensive that it should be held responsible for any wrongdoing.

The trial is scheduled to last five weeks.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/10/26-2

US Helicopters, Commandos Attack Syrian Border Town Killing Eight


In a report from local witnesses later confirmed by a Syrian government spokesman, Two US helicopters landed in the Syrian border town of Al-Sukkariya while others remained in the air and eight American soldiers exited. The soldiers killed at least eight people in the attack, and wounded 14 others before reboarding the helicopters and returning to Iraqi territory.

The US military has yet to officially confirm the strike, the first US strike on Syrian soil, but an unnamed US official confirmed the strike, saying that due to Syrian inaction they were now “taking matters into our own hands” with regards to foreign fighters.

Israel’s Channel 10 reports that unnamed western defense officials told them that the troops were carrying out a military operation against “al-Qaeda activists” in Syria. Witnesses say those killed were construction workers.

It has been speculated that the attack might be related to US military operations in the area, but there really haven’t been any. Major General John Kelly described security incidents in that area of Iraq as “almost meaningless now” and was reportedly optimistic about cutting troops in the area.

The attack comes as particularly surprising considering the US was reported earlier this month to be mulling lifting sanctions against Syria in light of their indirect peace talks with Israel. Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem had said there was “good progress” in a dialogue aimed at improving US-Syrian relations. Syria has reportedly summoned the US Charges d’Affaires to officially complain about what it calls an attack on its sovereignty.
http://news.antiwar.com/2008/10/26/us-helicopters-commandos-attack-syrian-border-town-killing-nine/

Sunday, October 26, 2008

2008 National Conference Report back


MORE THAN 170 students representing 36 schools around the country gathered at the 2008 Campus Antiwar Network (CAN) national conference to discuss the way forward for the movement.

Titled "It's Up to Us to Stop the War," the conference was held the weekend of October 10-12 at DePaul University in Chicago. CAN made a major shift in organizational priorities with the addition of a demand for immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan to its points of unity.

During the opening plenary discussion on why the U.S. is in the Middle East, speakers tackled the two pillars of U.S. imperialism today: oil and empire. They challenged the ideas that the race for oil is an issue of the past or motivated entirely by consumption.

In addition, they broke down some of the myths about the state of Israel and its oppression of Palestinians, the role of Israel and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East, and how they factor into the U.S. thirst for geopolitical domination.

Workshops addressed important questions for the movement, with Afghanistan taking center stage in light of the decision by U.S. rulers to pummel that country with a surge in military forces.

Presentations also were given on Palestine, the role of multinational corporations in the pillaging of Colombia, torture, the Iraqi refugee crisis, and divide-and-conquer strategies in Iraq. Some students said that they had learned more at a workshop than in a semester-long college course.

With that excitement, students broke out into strategy workshops to discuss their ideas and experiences in shaping their organizing when they return to their campuses. There was something for everyone: working with veterans; publicity and media; the economic war on students; a report back from the Republican National Convention student protest contingent; and the basics on how to develop a CAN chapter.

The "How to Start a CAN Chapter" workshop took on questions of confronting and working around university policy in order to promote a chapter. A student from Drake University spoke of not being able to approach people while tabling at her student union, and having to sit behind the table waiting for people to come to her. Some constructive suggestions were given, including one student who recommended that the table be on wheels, so that she could approach people and still be behind it.

On the evening of October 11, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) gave testimony about their experiences. Images provided during their testimony confirmed the use of white phosphorus on Iraqis. The presentation showed that chaos and a lack of infrastructure are rampant in Iraq. The dehumanization of not only Iraqis, but gays in the military was discussed, as well as subordination of women and ethnic minorities.

In reference to the United State's supposed goal of ridding Afghanistan of women's oppression, to paraphrase one of the veterans, "if you think that the military is on some feminist mission to free the women of Afghanistan, you are mistaken."Students agreeing

Organizing from the bottom up is a challenge, yet CAN has been able to double in size within the last year to over 50 chapters. Remaining independent from any political party has definitely added to its success, given that the Democratic and Republican parties are allied over the "war on terror." Additionally, the democratic process--the ability for each student to have a say and take part in action, has allowed for student members to flourish and leaders to develop.

At the voting session held on October 12, students debated and voted on the direction CAN should take for the next year.

Structurally, CAN will take on more responsibility in getting members educated on Afghanistan and Palestine. Politically, the movement took a large step and has added to its points of unity a call for immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan. In solidarity with their allies in IVAW, CAN now also stands for full economic reparations to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as full health and educational benefits for all military personnel regardless of their discharge status.

http://www.campusantiwar.net/news/national/2008_national_conference_report_back.html

Ex-Officer Linked to Brutality Is Arrested


CHICAGO — The authorities arrested a former Chicago police commander at his Florida home on Tuesday and charged him in a police brutality scandal that contributed to the emptying of Illinois’ death row and that continues to resonate as one of the most racially charged chapters in the city’s history.

The activities of the former commander, Jon Burge, 60, have been the subject of speculation for decades as scores of criminal suspects, many poor and black, have come forward saying they were routinely brutalized by Mr. Burge and the mostly white officers under his command on the South Side in the 1980s.

Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, said at a news conference that Mr. Burge “lied and impeded court proceedings” in 2003 when he provided false written answers to questions in a civil lawsuit that claimed he and other officers had abused inmates.

According to the indictment, Mr. Burge “well knew” he had participated in and was aware of “such events involving the abuse or torture of people in custody,” including wrapping inmates’ heads in plastic to make them feel as if they were suffocating.

The statute of limitations on the suspected torture has expired, but Mr. Fitzgerald said Mr. Burge would still be held accountable.

“There is no place for torture and abuse in a police station,” the prosecutor said. “No person is above the law, and nobody — even a suspected murderer — is beneath its protection.”

Calls for Mr. Burge’s prosecution, which were sounded for years, grew louder after a 2006 report by special state prosecutors supported what dozens of inmates had said about being brutalized in jail. The report took more than four years and included more than 700 interviews.

This year, the city approved a $20 million settlement with four former death row inmates who said they had been abused under Mr. Burge.

After posting $250,000 bond, Mr. Burge left the federal courthouse in Tampa, Fla., on Tuesday. He said only that he planned to plead not guilty to two counts of obstruction of justice and one count of perjury. He is scheduled to be arraigned Monday in Chicago.

If he is found guilty, Mr. Burge faces up to 20 years in prison for each obstruction of justice charge, five years for perjury and a $250,000 fine on each count.

The investigation is continuing, and may result in more indictments, officials in Mr. Fitzgerald’s office said.

“It’s a start, after 25 years,” said a defense lawyer, Flint Taylor, who has called for investigations of Mr. Burge and his officers for decades. “After years of struggle, maybe a modicum of justice will be attained here.”

The indictment could mean a great deal of work for prosecutors here, with defense lawyers expected to line up to file motions to overturn convictions during Mr. Burge’s tenure.

“I believe there are 40 to 50 cases where there was evidence of torture and the primary evidence against the defendant was a confession,” said Andrea D. Lyon, a law professor at DePaul University and former head of the Illinois Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Mayor Richard M. Daley was the Cook County state’s attorney during the time of many of the accusations against Mr. Burge.

“Obviously, the Burge case recalls a terrible chapter in our city’s history,” Mr. Daley said. “Some of the police behavior at that time was detestable, which is why steps have been put into place to ensure that the kinds of acts associated with Jon Burge never happen again.”

Monique Bond, a spokeswoman for the Chicago Police Department, which fired Mr. Burge in 1993, said the department supported the findings in the indictment.

Steve Myers contributed reporting from Tampa, Fla.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/22/us/22chicago.html?hp

ACLU Demands Information On Military Deployment Within U.S. Borders

NEW YORK – The American Civil Liberties Union today demanded information from the government about reports that an active military unit has been deployed inside the U.S. to help with "civil unrest" and "crowd control" – matters traditionally handled by civilian authorities. This deployment jeopardizes the longstanding separation between civilian and military government, and the public has a right to know where and why the unit has been deployed, according to an ACLU Freedom of Information request filed today.

"The military's deployment within U.S. borders raises critical questions that must be answered," said Jonathan Hafetz, staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project. "What is the unit's mission? What functions will it perform? And why was it necessary to deploy the unit rather than rely on civilian agencies and personnel and the National Guard? Given the magnitude of the issues at stake, it is imperative that the American people know the truth about this new and unprecedented intrusion of the military in domestic affairs."

According to a report in the Army Times, the Army recently deployed an active military unit inside the United States under Northern Command, which was established in 2002 to assist federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities. This deployment marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to Northern Command.

Civilian authorities, not the military, have historically controlled and directed the internal affairs of the United States. This rule traces its origins to the nation's founding and has been reaffirmed in landmark statutes including the Posse Comitatus Act, which helps preserve the foundational principles of our Constitution and democracy.

"This is a radical departure from separation of civilian law enforcement and military authority, and could, quite possibly, represent a violation of law," said Mike German, ACLU national security policy counsel and former FBI Agent. "Our Founding Fathers understood the threat that a standing army could pose to American liberty. While future generations recognized the need for a strong military to defend against increasingly capable foreign threats, they also passed statutory protections to ensure that the Army could not be turned against the American people. The erosion of these protections should concern every American."

In order to assess the implications of the recent deployment, the ACLU requested the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security and Defense today to immediately make public all legal opinions, executive orders, presidential directives, memos, policy guidance, and other documents that authorize the deployment of military troops for domestic purposes.

Since the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the Department of Defense has dramatically expanded its role in domestic law enforcement and intelligence operations, including the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping programs, the Department of Homeland Security's use of military spy satellites, and the participation of military personnel in state and local intelligence fusion centers. The ACLU has repeatedly expressed concern about these incremental encroachments of the military into domestic affairs, and the assignment of active duty troops to Northern Command only heightens these concerns.

A copy of the ACLU's information request is available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/general/37272lgl20081021.html

Wealth Gap Creating a Social Time Bomb


Growing inequality in US cities could lead to widespread social unrest and increased mortality, says a new United Nations report on the urban environment.

In a survey of 120 major cities, New York was found to be the ninth most unequal in the world and Atlanta, New Orleans, Washington, and Miami had similar inequality levels to those of Nairobi, Kenya Abidjan and Ivory Coast. Many were above an internationally recognised acceptable "alert" line used to warn governments.

"High levels of inequality can lead to negative social, economic and political consequences that have a destabilising effect on societies," said the report. "[They] create social and political fractures that can develop into social unrest and insecurity."

According to the annual State of the World's cities report from UN-Habitat, race is one of the most important factors determining levels of inequality in the US and Canada.

"In western New York state nearly 40% of the black, Hispanic and mixed-race households earned less than $15,000 compared with 15% of white households. The life expectancy of African-Americans in the US is about the same as that of people living in China and some states of India, despite the fact that the US is far richer than the other two countries," it said.

Disparities of wealth were measured on the "Gini co-efficient", an internationally recognised measure usually only applied to the wealth of countries. The higher the level, the more wealth is concentrated in the hands of fewer people.

"It is clear that social tension comes from inequality. The trickle down theory [that wealth starts with the rich] has not delivered. Inequality is not good for anybody," said Anna Tibaijuka, head of UN-Habitat, in London yesterday.

The report found that India was becoming more unequal as a direct result of economic liberalisation and globalisation, and that the most unequal cities were in South Africa and Namibia and Latin America. "The cumulative effect of unequal distribution [of wealth] has been a deep and lasting division between rich and poor. Trade liberalisation did not bring about the expected benefits."

The report suggested that Beijing was now the most egalitarian city in the world, just ahead of cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Dire Dawa in Ethiopia.

In Europe, which was generally more egalitarian than other continents, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Slovenia were classed as the most equal countries with Greece, the UK and Spain among the least. "Disparities are particularly significant in the cities of eastern Europe, larger Spanish cities and in the north of England," it said.

It documents the seemingly unstoppable move of people away from rural to urban areas. This year it is believed that the number of people living in urban areas exceeded those in the countryside for the first time ever, but the report says there is no sign of the trend slowing.

"The dramatic transition between rural and urban communities is not over. Urbanisation levels will rise dramatically in the next 40 years to reach 70% by 2050," it predicts.

The most dramatic urbanisation has been taking place in China, with many millions of people moving from the countryside to cities. The report says 49 new cities have been built in the past 18 years. The rapid transition to an urban society has brought great wealth but also many negative results.

"China has attained some of the deepest disparities in the world with urban incomes three times those in rural areas. Inequalities are growing, with disproportionate rewards for the most skilled workers ... and serious problems for the unemployed and informal workers."

Urban growth rates are highest in the developing world, which absorbs an average 5 million new urban residents a month and is responsible for 95% of world urban growth. The report predicts that Asian cities will grow the most in the next 40 years and could have 63% of the world urban population by 2050.

Tokyo is expected to remain the world's largest mega city, with 36.4m people by 2025. But Mexico City, New York, and Sao Paulo could give way in the league table to Mumbai, Delhi and Dhaka. Kinshasa and Lagos are the two African cities expected to grow the most, with each adding more than 6 million people by 2025.

Rather than countryside to city movement, which has marked rapid population growth in the last 40 years, the UN expects more people to move from city to city.

Capital cities in particular are attracting much more of countries' investments and are growing fast. Some are becoming home to nearly half a country's population.

But the report also identified what it believes is the emergence of a new urban trend, with many cities now shrinking in size. The populations of 46 countries, including Germany, Italy, Japan and most former soviet states, are expected to be smaller in 2050 than they are now, and in the past 30 years, says the report, more cities in the developed world have shrunk than grown.

It found that 49 cities in the UK, including Liverpool and other old industrial centres in the north of England, and 100 in Russia reduced in size between 1990 and 2000, mainly because of unemployment. In the US 39 cities are smaller now than they were 10 years ago.

The reasons for the decline of cities was mostly economic, but the report says that the environment is now an important factor.

Air quality and pollution from mines, power plants and oil exploration have been responsible for population losses in India, Mexico and Africa, it says. "Cities tend to struggle most with health-threatening environmental issues, such as the lack of safe water, sanitation and waste."

http://www.truthout.org/article/102308D

A Financial Meltdown 30 Years in the Making


They break it, and we’re stuck with the bill.

In less than two weeks Congress lined up $700 billion to bail out the nation’s bankers, leaving millions of homeowners on the sidelines, facing foreclosure, bankruptcy, or both.

Somehow the argument that “it may seem unfair, but it was necessary” just doesn’t cut it. It’s no wonder that the most popular sign at labor’s September 25 protest on Wall Street said “Bailout = Bullsh*t.”

For union members, it sounds all too familiar. Management’s perennial argument for concessions—take the cuts or say goodbye to your job—hasn’t exactly saved U.S. manufacturing, whether in the 1980s or today.

In past recessions, it’s been each union for itself, and the companies always came out ahead. Corporations are already using the deep hole they’ve dug for themselves to demand even more from workers. Teamsters at the Minneapolis Star Tribune bucked the trend, refusing mid-contract concessions on September 10 and prompting newspaper executives to suspend a $9 million payment to their creditors.

“The company is asking us to slash our own throats to save their profits,” said Kevin Bialon, a 27-year pressman who served on the bargaining committee. “Management made the mistakes and they want workers to pay for it.”
CHICKENS HOME TO ROOST

Although today’s headlines don’t advertise it, the financial crisis is not a sudden surprise but the latest gloomy milestone in a 30-year drive to boost corporate profits, mainly by squeezing workers. The recent flurry of fast-and-loose home loans is a symptom, not the cause, of the problem.

Faced with falling profits in the 1970s, corporations everywhere rallied to restore their bottom lines. They pressed to shift taxes away from businesses and onto individuals, sowing the seeds of today’s state and local budget shortfalls. Deregulation was also a top priority, as restrictions from an earlier era—put in place to protect the public good—were wiped away. Starting in industries like airlines, trucking, and telecommunications, then later in banking and financial services, government protections were lifted and oversight was relaxed.

In addition, corporations turned the tables on who pays for retirement, shifting the risk—and sometimes the burden—onto individual workers and taxpayers.

On the job, corporations launched a full-scale assault on unions, piling up concessions, breaking longstanding pattern agreements, and introducing two-tier wages and benefits.

In 1978 the average wage for production workers was $16 an hour in today’s dollars. The average was still $16 by 2007. Companies put the squeeze on working conditions, too, through lean production and quality schemes that were a smokescreen to make workers do more with less.

Corporate heads were rewarded handsomely for their efforts. CEO pay skyrocketed from 27 times what the average worker made in 1973 to 275 times in 2007.

Wall Street’s short-term mentality spread far beyond the financial sector. Every plant, even every work group became a “profit center,” and had to produce sufficient returns—or else.

Firms like General Motors and General Electric got into the money game directly, making more profits in recent years from financial activity than they did by producing goods or services.
LESS MONEY, MORE PROBLEMS

The working-class squeeze pushed inequality through the roof. Today the top 5 percent of American families—those with household incomes over $150,000—now claim 35 percent of national income. Thirty years ago the top 5 percent took home 21 percent.

With wages flat-lined for over three decades, families scrambled to prop up their living standards, first with more women entering the workforce and then by working more hours.

But there is a limit to how many earners each family can have, or how much overtime workers can schedule, so debt became the solution to anemic paychecks. Workers turned to credit cards or used their homes as ATM machines.

Once the housing bubble burst, the system finally caved in on itself. Bad home loans were the spark, but the fuel for this financial wildfire was a generation of stagnant incomes and overstretched consumers.
ADDICTED TO DEBT

It wasn’t just consumers who leaned heavily on credit. In recent years corporate debt skyrocketed, and as long as short-term loans were plentiful, companies were happy to operate with a thin cushion. Now that the credit markets are clenched up, businesses are feeling the pinch.

The Hawaii Medical Center was an early victim, for example, forced into bankruptcy in September when its creditors refused to roll over $5 million in short-term loans.

More than a third of its 900 workers have been laid off. Companies that survive today’s frozen financial markets will continue to struggle with the rising cost of debt, raising the possibility of concessions and bankruptcies to come.

On the watchlist is FairPoint Communications, the company that took over Verizon’s landline operations in northern New England earlier this year. The company borrowed heavily to close the $2.5 billion deal, and the Communications Workers (CWA) argued at the time that workers and consumers would bear the burden if FairPoint’s plans went awry.

That risk is growing, as the handover from Verizon is months behind schedule and millions of dollars over-budget. FairPoint’s customers are cutting back or switching to lower-cost competitors.

“What’s going to happen to our pension?” asks Darlene Stone, chief steward at CWA Local 1400 in Burlington, Vermont.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune’s next step is also uncertain. Pressure on the paper’s owner, private equity firm Avista Capital Partners, is mounting. Two other Teamster locals have followed the pressmen and cancelled givebacks. Bialon, the pressman, reports that on October 1 the company laid off 18 union members.

“They said they needed to save $20 million to fend off bankruptcy,” he said. “But they’ve already gotten rid of a third of the workforce and no one from management has been let go. They wanted the world from us and were offering nothing in return.”

http://labornotes.org/node/1951

General strike in Greece with central protest march in Athens


A 24 hour general strike in Greece sees all public sector and large part of private sector closed as well as clashes between demonstrating strikers and riot police in Athens.

As of the early hours of the 21st of October, Greece is in a state of a general strike to be followed by a 24h strike of all shop workers on the following day. The industrial action which sees all the public sector including transport closed, and a large part of the private sector in standstill, is set to counter the neoliberalist measures of the government and especially the pension and social security reform that has caused the condemnation of the entirety of the working people of the country since its introduction last spring.

During the central protest march of the trade unions in the morning of the 21st in Athens, during which protesters decried a 28bn-euro (£22bn) government rescue package to banks hit by the international credit crisis - one banner reading: "Not one euro to support the capitalists" - strikers and students attacked banks and one bookshop that was operating on scab-labour, forcing them to close down. During the course of the protest march provocative riot police forces attempted to break the university asylum of Propylaea on whose grounds the initial gathering of the trade unions took place. This attempt was faced with the active response of anarchosyndicalists and students. The reaction of the police which employed tear gas against the demonstrators injuring two was effectively counteracted by an attack of the dockworkers in defense of the asylum.

http://www.libcom.org/news/general-strike-greece-with-central-protest-march-athens-21102008

Mexico's National Human Rights Commission Blames Plan Mexico for APPO Arrests


Official human rights ombudsman says the government believed Plan Mexico funds were conditioned on resolving Brad Will case

The Mexican government's human rights watchdog, the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH in its Spanish initials) slammed the Federal Attorney General's office (PGR) yesterday over the arrests of Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca (APPO) supporters in the Brad Will murder case.

The PGR arrested three APPO supporters and has issued warrants for eight more in the Will case. JosƩ Luis Soberanes FernƔndez, the head of the CNDH, said that with the arrests, the PGR made the decision "to ignore the body of evidence that we sent it" regarding the case.

One principal component of the CNDH report that the PGR explicitly rejected was that Will was shot from a distance of 35-55 meters, not the 2 meters that the PGR claims. Despite the fact that a forensic video specialist hired by the Will family has found bullet streaks in the last two frames of Will's video, and that anyone who shot Will at close range would have appeared in his video since he was shot head-on, the PGR maintains that the APPO supporters standing around Will were the ones who murdered him.

The CNDH and the PGR have exchanged harsh criticisms since the APPO arrests. The CNDH accuses the PGR of making arrests "on a whim" and that its behavior "lacks professionalism and responsibility."

The PGR criticized the CNDH after it publicly released its report and recommendations in the Will case, saying that the CNDH had "leaked" information about the case, and threatened legal action as a result.

The CNDH's Soberanes FernƔndez shot back, saying, "Whatever. There will be more [threats]. They've gotten into that nasty little habit recently. It's all part of the job. It's a very despicable way for the PGR to fight: instead of using reason and arguments, it fights with threats. This dispute will have to go to court."

It's all about the money

Soberanes FernƔndez believes Plan Mexico is to blame for the recent and sudden arrests in the Will case. He says the government arrested the APPO supporters "because in the United States they are pressuring them," he responded. "It's said that they weren't going to give them the Merida Initiative resources if they didn't resolve this case, and therefore they had to clear it up at any cost, and now we see the results."

While Plan Mexico funds are not legally conditioned on resolving the Will case, an earlier House version of Plan Mexico did call for a "thorough, credible and transparent investigation" of the murder, along with investigations into police behavior in San Salvador Atenco, where 26 women reported physical, verbal, and sexual violence--including gang rape--perpetrated against them by police. This language was removed from the version of the bill that was signed into law, but it remains in an explanation that accompanies the bill.

Mexico and the United States are currently in final negotiations over the release of Plan Mexico funds. The arrests in the Will case came just six days before US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited with her Mexican counterpart to discuss Plan Mexico, and just one day prior to US drug tsar John Walters' visit to Mexico city to discuss the release of funds.

Human rights conditions backfire

Friends of Brad Will, an organization of Will's friends and family who are fighting for justice in the murdered Indymedia journalist's case, have opposed Plan Mexico since it was first proposed in October 2007. They were joined in their opposition by Global Exchange, Witness for Peace, the Center for International Policy's Americas Program, the AFL-CIO, Tikkun, CISPES, Alliance for Democracy, Maryknoll Global Conerns, the Latin American Solidarity Committee, and Jews for Racial and Economic Justice.

According to Robert Jereski from Friends of Brad Will, his organization chose to oppose Plan Mexico outright instead of pushing for human rights conditions because "we saw what happened with Plan Colombia and those human rights conditions. They didn't stop that country from becoming the worst country in the world for rights for labor activists, where hundreds have been assassinated by the government or government-supported paramilitaries. We saw how ineffective the conditions were, that [Plan Colombia] resulted in 4 million displaced people driven off of resource-rich land by the same thugs the US government has been supporting through the Uribe government and military. We had serious doubts about value of human rights conditions."

The big players in human rights, however, remained silent throughout much of the debate over Plan Mexico. Human Rights Watch did not take a stance on the initiative until after it was passed. Amnesty International only weighed in publicly after the measure had passed both houses of congress. Its Mexico office circulated a letter calling US collaboration with Mexico "appropriate and timely" and simply requested that human rights conditions be included in the final version that would be sent to the president.

Only the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) testified before Congress regarding the initiative. WOLA strongly criticized the bill, saying that it would not lead to an overall reduction in drug trafficking and noting that US training has often backfired in Mexico, as in the case of Los Zetas, an elite special forces team that defected from the Mexican military to become the armed wing of the Gulf drug cartel. WOLA did not, however, oppose the bill; it merely offered suggestions for how to improve the military and law enforcement strategy of combatting drug cartels, such as "be careful who you train."

When Plan Mexico passed, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch praised the human rights conditions and failed to take a strong stance on further US support for corrupt and brutal Mexican military and police forces and the continuance of the failed policy of using the military to combat cartels. Amnesty International's post-passage press release stated, "the final bill is an important first step to prevent military and police abuses, including torture."

Those organizations that opposed Plan Mexico from the beginning were horrified--but not at all surprised--that the human rights conditions regarding the Will case backfired. Laura Carlsen of the Center for International Policy's Americas Program, said, "Of the cases that Congress demanded progress on as a precondition to releasing finds under Plan Mexico, both have resulted in movement by the Mexican government--to scapegoat the protesters. One was Brad Will where pressure by the family and Friends of Brad Will has kept the issue alive and made it impossible for the US government to ignore. The Amendment Three to the House version demanded proof of progress within 45 days of enactment although the final version omitted this particular demand. Now the government has imprisoned not the government-affiliated thugs directly implicated by videos and forensics examinations, but APPO members."

Carlsen noted that Will's case was not the only one that seemed to be affected by Plan Mexico's human rights conditions. Plan Mexico also called for a "thorough, credible and transparent investigation" of police behavior in San Salvador Atenco in May 2006. According to Carlsen, "the response [in this case] was to sentence movement leaders to 69 years while granting impunity to the police and politicians who orchestrated the rape, torture and beatings of protesters in police custody."


http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/kristin-bricker/2008/10/mexicos-national-human-rights-commission-blames-plan-mexico-appo-ar

Layoffs rise with world financial crisis


The financial crisis and credit squeeze is beginning to have deeper economic and social consequences for working people worldwide despite the injection of hundreds of billions of dollars into the banking system by Washington and imperialist governments in Europe.

“U.S. industrial activity is falling at the fastest pace in decades,” noted Investor’s Business Daily October 16, “adding to evidence that the credit crunch is causing the economy to reverse faster than expected.”

Nationwide production at factories, mines, and utilities declined 2.8 percent in September, the largest monthly drop since December 1974, according to the Federal Reserve.

These figures reflect rising layoffs and plant closures as workers face what could become the deepest recession in decades. General Motors is closing its SUV plant in Janesville, Wisconsin, on December 23, laying off 1,200 members of the United Auto Workers. The company also announced that a stamping plant near Grand Rapids, Michigan, employing some 1,500 workers, will shut its doors at the end of 2009. Daimler AG, the world’s largest maker of heavy vehicles, said October 14 it is closing plants in Oregon and in Ontario, Canada, eliminating 3,500 jobs. Alcoa, the largest U.S. aluminum company, is shutting its smelter in Rockdale, Texas, cutting 660 jobs by early December.

Retail sales decline
U.S. retail sales have declined for three months in a row, the first time this has happened since 1992, when records began being kept. In September sales were down 1.2 percent, which included a decline of nearly 4 percent in sales of cars and auto parts and 2.3 percent in clothing and furniture purchases. Linen ‘n Things, once the second largest U.S. home furnishings chain and now in bankruptcy, is conducting liquidation sales at its 371 stores. Circuit City, the nation’s second largest electronics retailer, said as an alternative to bankruptcy it may close at least 150 stores, cutting thousands of jobs.

Construction of new homes and apartments dropped to an annual rate of 817,000 in September, the Commerce Department reported October 17. Excluding January 1991, housing starts have never been lower since records began in 1959.

Officials of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Agency have said that the transit system there faces major cutbacks because funds it borrowed from American International Group to lease trains and buses are no longer available. The giant insurance company nearly collapsed in September and Washington bailed it out with nearly $123 billion. Transit agencies in San Francisco, Chicago, and Washington, D.C., face similar problems, reported USA Today.

Meanwhile, the U.S. budget deficit for the just-ended 2008 fiscal year rose to $455 billion. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that for the current fiscal year this will rise more than 50 percent to about $700 billion.

Banks may sit on bailout funds
Sinking hundreds of billions of dollars by the capitalist rulers into the banking system with the aim of unlocking the credit freeze has had little effect. Banks receiving this money are under no obligation to lend it. “It’s clear that the government would like us to use the capital,” said Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, according to the New York Times. “If you are a bank that is filling a hole, you obviously can’t do that.”

Since mid-2007 the nine largest U.S. commercial banks have written off $323 billion in “troubled assets.” This wipes out their combined reported profit of $305 billion since 2004. “Banks may sit on the capital,” noted the October 17 International Herald-Tribune. “Some analysts say the banks may use it to acquire weaker competitors.”

The most devastating impact of the financial crisis is on the semicolonial countries, where toilers have faced depression conditions for years. With weakening currencies, the massive debts owed to banks in imperialist centers become all the more unpayable. Declining prices of exported commodities and raw materials compound the problem. Since August 4 the Mexican peso has sunk 20 percent to an all-time low against the dollar. The Brazilian real has dropped 26 percent over this time period. South Korea’s currency, the won, is down 30 percent against the dollar this year.

Banks that have invested in stocks, bonds, and other paper products on the so-called emerging markets for much higher return rates have massively withdrawn these funds. “More than $1.3 trillion in value has been wiped off emerging market stocks this year in cities such as Moscow, Sao Paulo, Jakarta and Osaka,” stated the Washington Post. The global credit crisis has also led the governments of Hungary and Ukraine to seek outside help to bail out their banks. The European Central Bank is providing Budapest with $6.4 billion. Kiev is requesting $14 billion from the International Monetary Fund.

http://www.themilitant.com/2008/7243/724303.html

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Anarchism And Neighborhood Associations


Anarchism And Neighborhood Associations by Larry Gambone

Background


My neighborhood has a working class tradition, dating back to the coal miners who settled here 120 years ago. The mines are long gone, and the work has changed from blue collar to white collar, yet the area is still inhabited by working people and proud to be so. Most people live in small to moderate size single family dwellings that were built before the First World War.

Problems


We face three major inter-linked problems. There has been an influx of drug addicts from the down town core. The development of shopping malls on the outskirts killed the old city, which was then taken over by the destitute and troubled. Real estate speculation and the refusal to build affordable housing, drove up the cost of rent, which created homelessness. After wrecking the city, the business interests decided to revitalize the down town as a tourist attraction. The drug addicts and homeless were then driven out, ending up in our neighborhood, the one nearest the old city centre. Conflict arose between the addicts and families with small children who feared an increasingly seedy, petty crime and needle-laden environment.

The second problem is the potential for greedy developers to take advantage of our lower priced real estate, move in and turn our neighborhood into yuppie heaven. The third problem is a noisy, invasive glass recycling plant which threatens to drive out the people unfortunate enough to live near it. The city does nothing about this problem, yet they are quick as thieves to react to other situations. Ultimately, the three problems stem from being a working class neighborhood, if this was upper class area, none of these problems would be allowed to exist, but as workers, both at work and in our homes, we are expendable.

Our Neighborhood Association


Attempting to deal with these problems is our neighborhood association, a group that has been around for close to thirty years and had its ups and downs in terms of support and influence. We are not the only group in the neighborhood, but are the best organized and most respected. A vocal minority demand a vindictive, confrontational approach to the addiction problem. We do not, favoring a positive approach, one that emphasizes an active, clean neighborhood with public art and public activities. We have gotten absentee landlords to clean out their crack houses, favor support for the addicts and public housing for the homeless.

As to real estate development, we have made it clear the kind of multi-family dwellings we want – affordable ones – and with one exception, potential construction has been kept within our guidelines. We will also be working on a Neighborhood (development) Plan which will specify exactly the direction we wish our neighborhood to take. We keep up the pressure on the city about the glass plant, but so far not much progress.

This is not all we do. Part of the neighborhood is a river delta. The Association worked and encouraged the development of an Estuary Park to preserve this area for the wildlife. Each June we put on Miners Heritage Day, to remember and celebrate the coal miners who built this town. About 600 people usually attend and enjoy a large number of activities such as live music, barbeque, pancake breakfast, speeches, photo displays, rides for the children and a neighborhood heritage walk. We also do tree planting and annual neighborhood clean-ups. Several of our members are artists, so we have public art displayed on the chain link fence surrounding our neighborhood park. Since the city refuses to install street trash bins, we have provided our own, and painted them in bright colors and designs, under the guidence of our artist members.

Our association has about 25 core members, but many other people help at events. From 100- 450 people, depending on the issue at hand, attend our public meetings. The association newsletter goes out to at least 200 families. Most core members are supporters/members of the social democratic New Democratic Party or the Green Party, but there are also Liberals and Communist Party people. Among those 25 people is a wealth of trade union, community and environmental activism, not to mention local history and culture. I am the only anarchist in the "core group", though several other anarchists are there to help out. Here is something interesting and important. Regardless of ideology, when dealing with neighborhood, or even city issues, we all tend to see eye-to eye. The real division is between the Association and the reactionary/developer crowd. This is something I have also seen in trade union work, practical, local issues unite people. No matter what our other beliefs, we all desire more control of the neighborhood by the people living there. We all want a humane and democratic process. We all want the protection/restoration of the environment. We all oppose NIMBYism and welcome social housing and social services in our neighborhood.

The Potential of Neighborhood Associations


City government, like all levels of government is centralized, hierarchical and in the hands of capitalists and their friends. At best, it poorly expresses the wishes of the working class majority. Neighborhood associations in working class areas are, on the other hand, grass roots expressions of that class. Furthermore, such associations attract the most advanced militants – the natural leadership of the neighborhood. We are not the only association in the city and a Neighborhood Association Network exists, but to date, not much is happening with it. We do, however, work very closely with the association of the neighborhood next to ours. The idea of a network (or federation) is a good one and has great potential. But here is where the real future lies: Should dissatisfaction continue to grow against authoritarian forms of governance, the possibility exists that these associations form the nucleus of Neighborhood Assemblies which could then supplant city council.

Anarchists ought to consider joining their neighborhood association, and if one does not exist, forming one. These associations are an excellent way of getting involved in the community, meeting other militants and laying the groundwork for genuine self-government through a federation of neigborhood assemblies.


http://www.anarkismo.net/article/10461

Rise of the Latin Africans


A new black-power movement in Central and South America

By Joe Contreras
Pambazuka News

Hugo ChĆ”vez is known as a revolutionary in many contexts, especially in his defiance of the United States. In recent years however he’s also broken ground on a far less well-exposed subject: the question of race in Latin America. The saga began two years ago, when, during a tour of Gambia, ChĆ”vez surprised observers by declaring that ‘I’ve always said that if Spain is our mother, Africa, mother Africa, is much more so.’ Since then, the Venezuelan leader has often revisited the theme at home, even drawing attention to his own African roots. It may not sound shocking. But such language would have been inconceivable from a major Latin American leader just a short time ago.

That’s now changing, due to a black-consciousness movement stirring in Central and South America. Emboldened by the success of their indigenous countrymen in pressing for resolution of long-ignored grievances, Afro-descendientes (people of African descent), as they are known, are now lobbying for recognition of their own communities’ land rights and for increased spending to improve living conditions in urban slums and rural villages. Local activists have begun urging Latin blacks to take pride in their culture, and with the help of the Internet, leaders are reaching across borders to share tactics and compare notes with their brethren in the Caribbean, the United States and Africa. This ‘black-power movement has gone way beyond anything that has happened in the past,’ says Ann Farnsworth-Alvear, director of Latin American and Latino Studies at the University of Pennsylvania. ‘People are making critiques of racism in their own societies, and there’s been a real shift in black consciousness and involvement.

Black power isn’t entirely new to the region; for some time now the descendants of African slaves have wielded political clout in a few corners of the hemisphere. That’s especially the case in the English-speaking Caribbean, where black heads of state are the rule. And in Brazil, where nearly half the country’s 192 million people have African ancestry, Joaquim Barbosa, arguably the most influential member of the Supreme Court, is black; so is recording artist Gilberto Gil, who served as culture minister under President Luiz InĆ”cio Lula da Silva for five years. Moreover, Lula’s predecessor, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, once announced that he himself had ‘one foot in the kitchen’­a colourful way of admitting intermarriage among his ancestors (albeit one that earned him criticism at the time).

In the rest of Latin America, blacks remain a small (they’re thought to number about 20 million, though activists claim the figure is much higher) and marginalised minority. Demographics highlight their second-class status. For example, Ecuador’s blacks, who make up 5 percent of the population, suffer a 14.5 percent unemployment rate, higher than that of the country’s non-black majority and twice that of indigenous groups. In neighbouring Colombia, which is home to 10.5 million Afro-descendientes­giving it the third largest black population in the hemisphere, after Brazil and the United States­only one in five blacks has access to electricity and running water (compared with 60 percent of the rest of the population), and the black infant mortality rate is more than three times the white level.

Now, however, black communities are organising and pressing for change. In Honduras, for example, locals of African descent, who are known as Garifunas, have staged protests in Tegucigalpa, the capital, against a proposed constitutional amendment that would permit foreigners to purchase property along the Atlantic coast, a region the Garifunas have called home since 1797. And in Ecuador, more than a hundred black housewives and working women joined forces in 2006 to seek more government assistance for housing to combat racial discrimination in the rental market.

The epicentre of the new black activism, meanwhile, is Colombia. That’s due as much to circumstance as design: more than a third of the 3.2 million Colombians uprooted by the country’s long-running civil war are of African ancestry, as are many of the ragged street vendors and beggars who approach motorists at busy BogotĆ” intersections. Foreign and local NGOs are now working hard to publicise their plight. Though a landmark 1993 law enshrined the right of Afro-Colombians to obtain formal title to their ancestral lands, including 5 million hectares along the Pacific coast­a unique experiment in ethnic self-government­implementation has lagged, as unscrupulous agribusinesses and paramilitary warlords have seized communal property with near impunity. But recently, as part of its ongoing effort to win US approval for a free-trade agreement, the government of President Alvaro Uribe has begun to expel these companies and restore 8,000 hectares of stolen land to Afro-Colombian community councils.

Throughout the region, individual blacks have also begun blazing new trails. Graciela Dixon became the first black woman to head Panama’s Supreme Court in 2005, and Luis Alberto Moore, a cop in Colombia, has reached the rank of general­a first for an Afro-descendiente. ‘I hope I will serve as an example for other black people in Colombia who will say, ‘If General Moore did [it], then so can I’,’ says the 48-year-old BogotĆ” native.

But many other Latin blacks remain reluctant to openly acknowledge their background, which makes it hard for their communities to increase their influence. In 2005, for example, when Colombians were asked for the first time to identify their ethnic background in a census, less than half the country’s blacks described themselves as such. Doris de la Hoz, a senior Afro-Colombian official in the Ministry of Culture, says that even this percentage represented progress, since more than 4 million people did acknowledge their heritage. But ‘there is still a strong separation of people by groups,’ she says, ‘and many black families try to convince their lighter-skinned children that they are white.

Yet such attitudes also seem to be shifting, albeit gradually. Evelyne Laurent-Perrault, 48, is the daughter of Haitian immigrants and grew up in middle-class Caracas, where she was usually the only black in her classroom and, later on, her office. Over the years she’s endured her fair share of cruel jokes. Starting in her twenties, however, Laurent-Perrault, a biologist by training, began to develop a passionate interest in her culture and its links to Africa. She is now working on a Ph.D. at New York University analysing the topic in the context of Venezuela. ‘There is [now] more pride in being black,’ she says. ‘People are mobilising, and organisations have arisen in almost all of Latin America to expose inequality and demand that this must end.

Such organisations are drawing inspiration and financing from foreign, largely US, sources. In February, African-American journalist Lori Robinson launched a new website called vidaafrolatina.com that spotlights news, cultural events and commentary by and about Afro-Latinos. Leading members of the US Congressional Black Caucus, like Rep. Gregory Meeks, have taken a special interest in Afro-Colombians and dispatched staff to advise black Colombian legislators. USAID has funded a variety of social and economic development projects in predominantly black areas of western Colombia, and has provided money and technical assistance to an association of black mayors and groups working on behalf of internal refugees. The groundbreaking presidential bid of a certain young US senator hasn’t gone unnoticed in the region, either. ‘A triumph of Barack Obama would be extraordinary,’ gushes Ernesto EstupiƱan, mayor of the predominantly black Ecuadorian city of Esmeraldas. ‘It would be a huge encouragement for all of us in terms of minority participation in politics.’ Indeed, if Obama does reach the White House, one of his familiar slogans could soon take root in the hearts and minds of his fellow Africano-Americanos south of the border: ‘¡SĆ­ se puede!’ (‘Yes we can!’).

With Steven Ambrus in BogotĆ”, Maria Amparo Lasso in Mexico City and Phil Gunson in Caracas

* Joseph Contreras became Newsweek’s Latin America Regional Editor in July 2002, moving from his previous position as Miami bureau chief, where he’d been since August 1999, and has been based in Mexico City since June 2006.

http://illvox.org/2008/10/25/rise-of-the-latin-africans/

report: "Uncertainty clouds Nahr al-Bared's future"


One year has passed since the first Palestinians were allowed to return to the outskirts of the Nahr al-Bared refugee camp, destroyed by the Lebanese army during three months of fighting in the summer of 2007 with Fatah al-Islam, a small Islamist militant group. Meanwhile, up to 15,000 people have resettled in the camp. Many of them are still waiting to freely access their destroyed homes, as the Lebanese army still exclusively controls the "old camp" in the core of Nahr al-Bared, as well as parts of the "new camp" on the outskirts.

Abu Khalil, owner of a small bookstore at the former main street of the camp, says that he spent $3,000 on infrastructure and $10,000 on merchandise to reopen his shop after the war. However, he's struggling with low numbers of customers. He explains that before the war, not only Palestinians from the camp came to his bookstore, but also Palestinian refugees from nearby Beddawi camp and Lebanese from the northern region of Akkar, "I used to sell to 100,000 people, these days I only sell to the 13,000 who are present in Nahr al-Bared. Now, I'm essentially besieged. The Lebanese army should allow people to freely enter and leave the camp!"

Nahr al-Bared refugee camp was a thriving economic center in northern Lebanon, nestled between the city of Tripoli and the Syrian border along the coastal highway that joins the north to Beirut. Nidal, a political leader in the camp, explains that "It was well-known that in Nahr al-Bared you could buy goods on credit. Lebanese shops don't work this way. Also, things here were cheaper and people imported directly from foreign countries." Unlike other Palestinian camps in Lebanon, Nahr al-Bared was for many years accessible without restrictions. Only a few months before the Lebanese army launched its devastating attack against the camp, checkpoints were erected on the camp's perimeter. While these checkpoints inflicted damage on the local economy, they were apparently unable to stop massive amounts of weapons and ammunition from entering the camp and reaching the militants of Fatah al-Islam.

A widely held belief among Palestinians from Nahr al-Bared is that the camp's success was the real reason it was destroyed by the Lebanese army. However, Nidal warns that one should not overestimate economic factors, stating, "Maybe they were partly motivating the destruction, but surely there were other reasons - political ones. These are related to the Palestinian right of return to their homeland and to its opposite, to their resettlement in Lebanon." He recalls Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora's statement at the time that he intended to make Nahr al-Bared a "model camp" for all Palestinians in Lebanon.

In spite of the promises by Lebanese leaders to rebuild the camp, many refugees from the old camp of Nahr al-Bared are skeptical that this will actually happen. Abu Khalil complains that they were told many empty promises: "They said they'd start in the beginning of September. Then on 15 September, then on 20 September. Now they say they'll start after the Eid [holiday at the end of Ramadan]. God knows how long it will take again after the Eid."

The initial reconstruction plan by the Lebanese government and the UN agency for Palestine refugees, UNRWA, set the 15 August 2008 as the date for the beginning of the staged reconstruction process. However, until now nothing has been done and the reasons for this are unclear. Recently, camp residents were told that the bulldozers, trucks and other machines weren't ready. On 6 October they were told that the army needed time to train the construction workers regarding unexploded ammunition. On 10 October, some bulldozers finally appeared in the old camp and appeared to be widening and preparing the streets for more construction machines and trucks to enter.

Those families currently living in temporary housing, known as "the barracks," are losing their patience. A resident of the barracks on the camp's northern end complains about the miserable housing conditions and says, "They just brought us here in order to silence us. That's what the barracks and the aid packages are for. But we insist on returning to the old camp as soon as possible." Although, there is hardly any visible political activism inside Nahr al-Bared regarding return to the old camp, on 1 October, the first day of the Eid, residents successfully broke through the soldiers lines to visit the graves of their relatives. The army had intended to allow visitors to enter the severely damaged old graveyard at the old camp's southern entrance in small groups and only after security checks. However, residents started shouting at the soldiers and eventually broke through the checkpoint to reach the cemetery.

While Nidal is convinced that the camp will be rebuilt, instead he asks, "Who's going to administer the camp? The Popular Committee of Nahr al-Bared or the Lebanese authorities through the Internal Security Forces?" He fears the implementation of Siniora's plan will be detrimental to Palestinian self-governance and keep the camp under Lebanese control.

Residents have already started to avoid discussing political topics and issues regarding developments inside the camp for fear of an increased number of spies and collaborators working for the Lebanese secret services. The suspected recruitment of collaborators also seems to have a negative impact on the unity of the refugees in Nahr al-Bared who appear to be losing trust for other residents in the camp. Such developments indicate - in contrast to the promises made by the Lebanese government and UNRWA - a cloudy future for Nahr al-Bared.


http://a-films.blogspot.com/1998/10/report-uncertainty-clouds-nahr-al.html

Maryland State Troopers' Spy Effort Was Wider

Maryland State Police spied on environmentalists - not just the death penalty opponents and war protesters that officials had previously acknowledged watching and entering into a database of terrorism suspects - a revelation that has intensified calls for new regulations on surveillance of activist groups.

Mike Tidwell, executive director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, released yesterday an Oct. 6 letter from the state police superintendent informing him that he was a target of surveillance in 2005 and 2006 and was entered into a multistate database as a suspected terrorist. Two of his former colleagues - including former Deputy Director Josh Tulkin - received similar letters, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland says that more people are expected to come forward in coming weeks to show the scope of the spying.

Maryland State Police officials, who declined to comment on Tidwell's case, have sent letters to 53 people to inform them that they had been spied upon.

A report released this month said the state police "over-reached" and disregarded civil rights in their surveillance of anti-death penalty and peace groups, and advised that such spying should be prohibited. David Rocah, an attorney for the ACLU of Maryland, said yesterday that it is becoming clear that the state police have not told the full story.

Meanwhile, Rocah said, "Not a single leader of any death penalty group in the state of Maryland has received a letter indicating they're in the state police database."

State police officials had said they began the surveillance out of concern about demonstrations around executions.

The report, written by former Attorney General Stephen H. Sachs, stated that, beyond the anti-death penalty and peace groups, there was a "somewhat broader effort to develop information about Maryland's activist community." But environmental advocacy groups fell beyond the charge that Sachs was given by Gov. Martin O'Malley.

Tidwell, Roach and others held a news conference and rally yesterday morning in Silver Spring, at which they called on state lawmakers to pass legislation to prohibit spying on peaceful activists.

"As if it weren't disturbing enough that volunteer peace activists were on this list, now it's ... mainstream, nonprofit leaders," Tidwell said. "My group is transparent. I have nothing to hide."

The chairman of the state Senate's Judicial Proceedings Committee, Brian E. Frosh, said he was surprised that a well-known environmental advocacy group's leaders were targeted. He requested all documents on the spying operation in July and again last month, hoping that they would resolve unanswered questions. But he hasn't seen them yet.

"It's insane," the Montgomery County Democrat said. "It's wasteful in terms of police resources, and it obviously is not the kind of political operation one hopes for in a democratic society."

Frosh said he believes the General Assembly will consider legislation in its next session to allow state police surveillance of activist groups based on a "reasonable articulable suspicion" that someone has committed a crime or is likely to do so and only if there is no less-intrusive way to get that information. Frosh said he doesn't think the state police can be counted on to regulate themselves.

The spying came to light this summer when the ACLU obtained documents revealing that undercover agents infiltrated activist groups in 2005 and 2006 even though they had no evidence of potentially criminal acts, the legal standard for initiating such surveillance.

Tidwell does not know what information the state police gathered about him. He was told that he could view his file, and had an appointment this week to do so but canceled because he did not like the restrictions laid out by state police. Tidwell said he would not be allowed to bring his attorney or make copies, and that the records would be purged immediately after he saw them. ACLU attorneys have been in discussions with state officials about changing some of the rules.

Greg Shipley, a state police spokesman, said activists do not need lawyers and should not receive copies.

"We will not perpetuate future inappropriate action by providing copies that could be disseminated inappropriately," he said. He declined to say who else might be among the 53 who have received letters.

"This situation is between the Maryland State Police and the individuals named in our database," he said.

Tidwell said he wonders if he came to the attention of state police in 2004, after he and a handful of others were arrested for a nonviolent protest outside a coal-fired power plant in Montgomery County and charged with trespassing and misdemeanor loitering. Tidwell said the presiding judge at a brief court appearance called him "an exemplary citizen" for standing up for his principles.

Neither Tulkin nor the other former CCAN employee has ever been arrested or engaged in civil disobedience, Tidwell said.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Double Fundraiser Against Repression


In the spirit of solidarity, NEFAC-Boston is excited to offer you a great opportunity to give! We are selling the Certain Days: Freedom for Political Prisoners Calendar to support various struggles against political repression and the Prison Industrial Complex.

The money we spend on purchasing the calendars goes to the causes selected by the Certain Days crew.

These include:
New York State Task Force on Political Prisoners
Addameer
San Francisco 8

In addition, NEFAC-Boston will donate all proceeds from selling the
calendars locally to benefit the New Jersey 4.

Please purchase a calendar and help us show solidarity with these important struggles. The calendars are beautiful, including original artwork, writing and lots of information on political prisoners and many grassroots struggles. This year's theme is Grassroots Organizing. They make a great holiday gift, office decoration or just buy one for yourself!

We are selling the calendars for $12 each.

To purchase a calendar, please send a check or money order made out to "Northeastern Anarchist". Please include "Calendar" in the memo.

Orders can be mailed to:
NEFAC-Boston
P.O. Box 230685
Boston, MA 02123

If you live near Boston, Providence or Northampton, please email NEFAC-Boston to pick up calendars directly.

Order early! Thank you in advance for your participation and solidarity!

http://www.nefac.net/en/calendar

LaRiva battles for access and attention


“I hear people say, ‘There’s socialists? There’s actually socialist parties? I didn’t think they existed.’ We get no media access,” presidential candidate Gloria LaRiva said over coffee in Iowa City. “We can hardly get through.”

Presidential candidate who? Look at your ballot. She’s there, along with Obama and McCain and six others in Iowa — Gloria LaRiva, nominee of the Party for Socialism and Liberation. She had the time to give Iowa Independent a 45 minute world exclusive interview last Friday — something I failed to obtain from her Republican opponent, U.S. Sen. John McCain, the next day.

It’s hard to picture the serious LaRiva, visiting Iowa City as part of a driving tour that took her to Louisiana, Tennessee, and Chicago, as a Letterman or Leno guest. She says she is never asked the kinds of personal questions about things like family or musical tastes that the major party candidates are asked about. “They ask me ‘president of what?’” she says, and then voters, and LaRiva, quickly move on to the issues.

LaRiva, whose day job is as president of the Typographical Sector of the Northern California Media Workers Union, Communication Workers of America, says she’s in an unusual position for a third party candidate in that she actually represents majority opinion, citing health care as one example.

“When you hear Obama and McCain talk about health care, McCain is obviously for privatizing health care because he speaks to the rich. Obama’s audience is the working class, but it’s hard without a leftist or progressive explanation to know what he’s saying. What did he say the other day in the debate? He said ‘we will make it more accessible for people to buy insurance from all the plans that Congresspeople are entitled to. And if millions of more people buy insurance, it’ll lower the price of the premiums.’ Says who? There’s no discussion about limiting how much insurance companies can charge you for health care. There’s no solution to the health care crisis with Obama or McCain.”

“What do we say? End the war now. Use the military budget to provide health care. It should be provided by government. That should be the role of government, to make sure everybody has the right to see a doctor and have preventive care simply because they’re human.”

This is LaRiva’s second presidential bid. She was the nominee of the Worker’s World Party in 1992, was their vice presidential candidate four times, and has also run for state and local office in California. “Since I’ve run so many times, I’ve learned that people take elections very seriously.”

The new Party of Socialism and Liberation was founded in 2004, and this is their first time on the presidential ballot. “We’ve accomplished quite a lot in our four years of existence,” said LaRiva. “The fact that our first time out we are on the ballot in more states, twelve, than other socialist parties, is quite a feat. It’s an endeavor to get on any state ballot.” Iowa requires 1,500 signatures to get on the presidential ballot. LaRiva and volunteers gathered the names during June, when they also helped sandbag flooded areas.

“The fact that third parties have to go from state to state to get on the ballot, while the Democrats and Republicans are on automatically, shows that the game is locked up for them.”

Ballot access is one barrier for third parties of the left, but LaRiva says the Democratic Party is also a barrier. “They have historically been the party that captivates and co-opts the movement.”

LaRiva lives in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco congressional district, and helped antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan get on the ballot against Pelosi. “There were a lot of progressive people saying, ‘Why are you doing this, (Pelosi)’s the best hope we have’ –even though she voted for the war budget and against impeachment.”

“He’s raised a lot of good ideas,” LaRiva says of Democrat Dennis Kucinich. “A lot of people are still wedded to the Democratic Party but very unhappy, or think it’s the only viable option.” But she added even a Democrat like Kucinich had trouble getting media access.

“Even though the Democrats, when they were running in 2006 said ‘elect us and we’ll end the war,’ they used it simply for political purposes,” said LaRiva. “Both parties have financed every dollar. It’s interesting to even now hear Obama say ‘I was against the war from the beginning,’ when every vote for emergency funding has been unanimous. So they’re both guilty,” she said of the major parties.

“A lot of the people we’ve met, from New Orleans to Tennessee, Iowa, everywhere we’re going, there’s a strong sentiment for Obama. Which is fine. I mean it’s understandable, because all they see is two choices,” said LaRiva. “But they are very open to what we think.”

“The financial crisis is due to the deregulation of the last 20 years,” is what LaRiva thinks of the bailout bill. “The right wing always talks about less government, less government, but what they really mean is less government on the right of capital to exploit.” She is calling for the prosecution of those responsible. “They’re getting rewarded and given a free ride. Congress can’t even find the guts to limit executive pay.” Then LaRiva corrected herself: “Not pay — pay is when you work for it.”

“They’re guilty of war crimes,” in Iraq, LaRiva says of President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and others in the administration, hoping they will eventually be prosecuted. “The progressive movement, of which we’re very much a part, has over the years had tribunals, indictments, and people’s prosecutions. It’s very necessary for the historical record.”

In Iowa, five of the nine candidates on the ballot can generally be described as “left.” But as for the thought that the multiple candidates of the left split the vote, LaRiva disagrees. “It’s a question a lot of people new to the movement ask; why not just have one candidate? But if all the left got together, we’re still not big enough. We really work together in many ways. We don’t spend our time fighting each other. We all have our different areas and outreach, and together it adds a lot.”

La Riva describes one of her opponents — though she certainly wouldn’t characterize Green presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney as an “opponent” — as a “great friend,” and it doesn’t sound like the My Great Friend platitudes major party politicians pile on each other (usually the pile gets deeper the less they like each other). “We support each other very much,” she said. “And Ralph Nader has a right to run and a right to be considered a legitimate presidential candidate.”

LaRiva doesn’t indulge in the vanity of some obscure contenders who rhetorically pretend they’re going to be elected. “I know where we’ll be” at noon next Jan. 20, said LaRiva. “We’ll be in Washington at a counter-inaugural.”

“It’ll be interesting in 2009,” she said of the next inauguration. “Probably Obama will win, if things continue as they are with the economy. And if he wins, it’ll be thoughtful for us to figure out how to have a counter-inaugural in the wake of a historic development of the first African American president. We will want to take note of that and recognize the achievement and what it means for the African American community and all of the United States. At the same time, we know that that will not make a change in terms of the end of the war, employment for people. And Obama will be the head of an imperialist government in a capitalist country.”

http://iowaindependent.com/7111/lariva-battles-for-access-and-attention

Labor Board Limits Political Strikes


An overlooked order by the Labor Board’s lead lawyer this summer dealt a serious blow to the rights of U.S. workers to protest government policies.

On May Day 2006, hundreds of thousands of immigrant workers walked off their jobs to protest restrictive immigration legislation. Some were fired, and brought complaints to the board. Ronald Meisburg, the National Labor Relations Board general counsel, responded by posting a directive on “political advocacy” this July that enables bosses to immediately fire employees who participate in work stoppages of a political nature.

The directive, as yet apparently unnoticed by both unions and labor lawyers, cannot be appealed.

Traditionally, workers around the world have used two kinds of walkouts to achieve their goals, economic strikes over workplace issues and political strikes directed at government policies.

Political strikes in the U.S. are not as common as in Europe and Latin America. But they have happened, as in the 1970s strike by coal miners for black lung legislation and in this year’s walkout by West Coast dock workers against the Iraq war.

The massive immigrants rights marches in May 2006 may have been the largest political strike in U.S. history. In the aftermath, numerous workers, mainly Latino, were fired from their jobs. Among them were employees at three restaurants. La Veranda, a Philadelphia eatery, terminated five workers who told their manager they would miss work. In Fresno, California, a restaurant fired eight of 13 workers for violating its attendance rules. And an Applebee’s restaurant whose location is unclear in the directive fired several workers who left work early. None of the workers belonged to a union.

The 2006 May Day cases appear to be the first to reach the NLRB where workers lost their jobs because of a politically inspired work stoppage.

Since labor law gives all workers—not just union members—a protected right to strike over matters affecting their livelihoods, some of these workers filed unfair labor practice charges at the NLRB seeking reinstatement and back wages.

The workers asserted that they had the same rights as union strikers, in particular, the right to conduct stoppages over workplace-related matters without permission.

Meisburg’s office dismissed the workers’ charges. In his directive, Meisburg, a management lawyer appointed by President Bush, asserted for the first time that work stoppages are protected by the National Labor Relations Act only if they are “directed at an employer who has control over the subject matter of the dispute.”

Thirty years ago the Supreme Court ruled that workers can take part in political activity in their workplaces if the issues involved have a substantial impact on workers’ rights or job conditions. Meisburg said his position was consistent with a footnote in that case, although no other legal authority had drawn such a conclusion.

Jack Getman, the University of Texas law professor who 40 years ago wrote the law-review paper cited by Meisburg to make his case, thinks the general counsel overreached.

"It is within the scope of [the law] for immigrant workers to pressure employers to support their political interests," he said. "There should be no doubt of the activity being protected."

Although the Meisburg directive does not go so far as to make political strikes illegal, the effect is the same. Unless the next general counsel reverses the order, union and non-union workers who hit the bricks over government policies on immigration, health care, or fuel prices, no matter how closely related these matters are to their employment, do so at the risk of immediately and permanently losing their jobs.

[Robert Schwartz is the author of Strikes, Picketing, and Inside Campaigns: A Legal Guide for Unions.

http://labornotes.org/node/1921